Erratum to: Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the first five years of Medicare Part D implementation, and when generic alternatives became available. METHODS The out of pocket patient costs for AIs and tamoxifen under Medicare Part D drug plans were determined for 2006-2011 from the CMS Website for the 50 US states and District of Columbia. RESULTS Between 2006 and 2010, the mean annual patient drug cost under Medicare Part D in the median state rose 19% for tamoxifen, 113% for anastrozole, 89% for exemestane, and 129% for letrozole, resulting in median annual out of pocket costs in 2010 of $701, $3050, $2804, and $3664 respectively. However, the 2011 availability of generic AI preparations led to median annual costs in 2011 of $804, $872, $1837, and $2217 respectively. Not included in the reported patient costs, the mean monthly drug premiums in the median state increased 58% in 2011 compared to 2007. CONCLUSIONS The more effective AI agents became considerably more expensive during the first several years of the Medicare Part D program. Cost decreased with the introduction of generic agents, an intervention that was independent of the Part D program. It is unlikely that the Part D program ameliorated existing socioeconomic disparities in survival among breast cancer patients, but the availability of generic agents may do so.
منابع مشابه
Socioeconomic Disparities in Mortality Among Women With Incident Breast Cancer Before and After Implementation of Medicare Part D
BACKGROUND Breast cancer patients exhibit survival disparities based on socioeconomic status (SES). Disparities may be attributable to access to expensive oral endocrine agents. OBJECTIVES Define recent socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival and determine whether these improved after implementation of the Medicare Part D program. DESIGN Difference-in-difference natural experime...
متن کاملCost-effectiveness of full coverage of aromatase inhibitors for Medicare beneficiaries with early breast cancer.
BACKGROUND Rates of nonadherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) among Medicare beneficiaries with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer are high. Out-of-pocket drug costs appear to be an important contributor to this and may be addressed by eliminating copayments and other forms of patient cost sharing. The authors estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of providing Medicare benefi...
متن کاملتاثیر درمان جایگزینی با هورمون (HRT) بر حساسیت ماموگرافی غربالگری در خانم های یائسه
Background and purpose:The risk of developing breast cancer during the liftime of females is 12.5% (about 1 in 8). Ïn addition hormone replacement therapy is part of the preventive measure in women at their menopausal period. Studies have revealed that screening mammography changes with age, mammographyic density and family history of breast cancer. This study was designed to evaluate the bre...
متن کاملA comparison of costs of Medicare Part D prescriptions dispensed at retail and mail order pharmacies.
BACKGROUND Plan sponsors encourage the use of mail order pharmacies because they believe mail order dispensing will lower their prescription drug costs. Health plans and pharmacy benefit management companies (PBMs) usually offer patients substantially lower copayments to incentivize them to use mail order pharmacies. A number of health plans and PBMs now require patients to use these pharmacies...
متن کاملAssociation of high cost sharing and targeted therapy initiation among elderly Medicare patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
High out-of-pocket costs may limit access to oral therapies covered by patients' prescription drug benefits. We explored financial barriers to treatment initiation in patients newly diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by comparing Medicare Part D patients with low out-of-pocket costs due to receipt of full low-income subsidies (LIS beneficiaries) to their counterparts who were...
متن کامل